Thomas More
W-L: ( 5- 9) PR = 86.7766Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 207 A Young Harris PBC ( 3-13, 86.3) 13-10 214 H Maryville GLVC (10- 4, 95.9) 2-27 221 H Tusculum SAC ( 8- 6, 91.1) 9-14 228 H Northwood GMAC (10- 4, 92.7) 5-18 307 A Lake Erie GMAC ( 3-10, 85.6) 16-10 314 H Seton Hill GMAC (15- 3, 96.5) 1-22 321 A Wheeling GMAC ( 6- 7, 87.7) 9-13 324 H Malone GMAC ( 1-13, 83.3) 16-15 328 A Davenport GLVC ( 9- 7, 91.6) 6-20 401 H Lincoln Memorial SAC ( 8- 8, 91.7) 5-22 404 H Davis & Elkins GMAC ( 1-12, 80.8) 28- 7 411 H Walsh GMAC ( 8- 9, 91.2) 8-20 421 A Tiffin GMAC ( 4- 9, 85.3) 13-11 425 A Davenport GLVC ( 9- 7, 91.6) 10-17
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
207 A Young Harris 13-10 3 0 + 3.10
214 H Maryville 2-27 -25 -9 0.00
221 H Tusculum 9-14 -5 -4 -1.22
228 H Northwood 5-18 -13 -5 0.00
307 A Lake Erie 16-10 6 1 ++ 4.34
314 H Seton Hill 1-22 -21 -9 0.00
321 A Wheeling 9-13 -4 -2 - -2.49
324 H Malone 16-15 1 4 - -2.98
328 A Davenport 6-20 -14 -5 0.00
401 H Lincoln Memorial 5-22 -17 -4 -0.66
404 H Davis & Elkins 28- 7 21 6 0.00
411 H Walsh 8-20 -12 -4 -1.13
421 A Tiffin 13-11 2 1 1.06
425 A Davenport 10-17 -7 -5 0.00
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 321 A Wheeling 9-13 -4 -2 - -2.49 324 H Malone 16-15 1 4 - -2.98 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 307 A Lake Erie 16-10 6 1 ++ 4.34 207 A Young Harris 13-10 3 0 + 3.10 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams State | Thomas More | Thomas More | ||
| Adelphi | Adelphi | Adelphi 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Alabama-Huntsville | Alabama-Huntsville | tied - 0- 3 | Alabama-Huntsville | |
| American International | Thomas More | Thomas More | ||
| Anderson (SC) | Anderson (SC) | Anderson (SC) 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Assumption | Assumption | Assumption | ||
| Barton | Barton | tied - 1- 0 | Barton | |
| Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | tied - 1- 0 | Belmont Abbey | |
| Bentley | Bentley | Bentley | ||
| Bridgeport | Bridgeport | Bridgeport | ||
| Caldwell | Thomas More | Thomas More | ||
| Catawba | Catawba | Catawba 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Chestnut Hill | Chestnut Hill | tied - 0- 1 | Chestnut Hill | |
| Chowan | Thomas More | Thomas More 3- 1 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Coker | Coker | Coker 2- 1 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Colorado Mesa | Colorado Mesa | Colorado Mesa | ||
| Concordia-Irvine | Concordia-Irvine | Concordia-Irvine | ||
| D'Youville | D'Youville | tied - 2- 0 | D'Youville | |
| Davenport | Davenport | Davenport | ||
| Davis & Elkins | Thomas More | Thomas More | ||
| District of Columbia | Thomas More | Thomas More 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Dominican (CA) | Thomas More | Thomas More | ||
| Dominican (NY) | Thomas More | Thomas More | ||
| Embry-Riddle | Embry-Riddle | Embry-Riddle | ||
| Emmanuel (GA) | Thomas More | tied - 1- 1 | Thomas More | |
| Emory & Henry | Thomas More | Thomas More 1- 2 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Felician | Thomas More | Thomas More 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Flagler | Flagler | Flagler | ||
| Florida Southern | Florida Southern | Florida Southern | ||
| Florida Tech | Florida Tech | Florida Tech | ||
| Franklin Pierce | Thomas More | Thomas More | ||
| Frostburg State | Frostburg State | Frostburg State 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Georgian Court | Georgian Court | Georgian Court | ||
| Holy Family | Holy Family | tied - 0- 1 | Holy Family | |
| Indianapolis | Indianapolis | Indianapolis 4- 2 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Lake Erie | Thomas More | Thomas More | ||
| Lander | Lander | Lander 2- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Lees-McRae | Lees-McRae | tied - 1- 0 | Lees-McRae | |
| Lenoir-Rhyne | Lenoir-Rhyne | Lenoir-Rhyne 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Lewis | Lewis | Lewis 4- 2 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Limestone | Limestone | Limestone | ||
| Lincoln Memorial | Lincoln Memorial | Lincoln Memorial | ||
| Lynn | Lynn | Lynn | ||
| Malone | Thomas More | Thomas More | ||
| Mars Hill | Mars Hill | tied - 1- 2 | Mars Hill | |
| Maryville | Maryville | Maryville | ||
| Mercy | Mercy | Mercy | ||
| Molloy | Molloy | Molloy | ||
| Montevallo | Montevallo | tied - 1- 1 | Montevallo | |
| Mount Olive | Mount Olive | tied - 1- 1 | Mount Olive | |
| Newberry | Newberry | Newberry 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| North Greenville | North Greenville | tied - 1- 0 | North Greenville | |
| Northwood | Northwood | Northwood | ||
| Pace | Pace | Pace 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Palm Beach Atlantic | Palm Beach Atlantic | Palm Beach Atlantic | ||
| Post | Post | Post | ||
| Quincy | Quincy | tied - 0- 2 | Quincy | |
| Roberts Wesleyan | Roberts Wesleyan | tied - 2- 1 | Roberts Wesleyan | |
| Rockhurst | Rockhurst | Rockhurst 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Rollins | Rollins | Rollins 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Seton Hill | Seton Hill | Seton Hill | ||
| Shorter | Thomas More | Thomas More 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Southern New Hampshire | Southern New Hampshire | Southern New Hampshire | ||
| St Anselm | St Anselm | St Anselm | ||
| St Leo | St Leo | tied - 0- 1 | St Leo | |
| St Michaels | St Michaels | St Michaels 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Tampa | Tampa | Tampa 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Tiffin | Thomas More | Thomas More | ||
| Tusculum | Tusculum | Tusculum | ||
| Virginia State | Thomas More | tied - 1- 1 | Thomas More | |
| Walsh | Walsh | Walsh | ||
| Westminster (UT) | Westminster (UT) | tied - 0- 1 | Westminster (UT) | |
| Wheeling | Wheeling | Wheeling | ||
| William Jewell | William Jewell | tied - 2- 1 | William Jewell | |
| Wilmington (DE) | Wilmington (DE) | Wilmington (DE) | ||
| Wingate | Wingate | Wingate 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Young Harris | Thomas More | Thomas More |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Young Harris ( 3-13, 86.3) 13-10 -13.56 8.38 0.54 1.05 9.37
0 H Maryville (10- 4, 95.9) 2-27 -4.05 17.90 -0.54 1.05 -4.82
0 H Tusculum ( 8- 6, 91.1) 9-14 -8.80 13.14 -0.54 1.05 -9.82
0 H Northwood (10- 4, 92.7) 5-18 -7.19 14.75 -0.54 1.05 -8.12
0 A Lake Erie ( 3-10, 85.6) 16-10 -14.33 7.62 0.54 1.05 8.57
0 H Seton Hill (15- 3, 96.5) 1-22 -3.36 18.59 -0.54 1.05 -4.10
0 A Wheeling ( 6- 7, 87.7) 9-13 -12.16 9.79 0.54 1.05 -12.21
0 H Malone ( 1-13, 83.3) 16-15 -16.56 5.38 -0.54 1.05 5.08
0 A Davenport ( 9- 7, 91.6) 6-20 -8.31 13.63 0.54 1.05 -8.17
0 H Lincoln Memori ( 8- 8, 91.7) 5-22 -8.25 13.70 -0.54 1.05 -9.23
0 H Davis & Elkins ( 1-12, 80.8) 28- 7 -19.08 2.86 -0.54 1.05 2.44
0 H Walsh ( 8- 9, 91.2) 8-20 -8.72 13.23 -0.54 1.05 -9.73
0 A Tiffin ( 4- 9, 85.3) 13-11 -14.60 7.34 0.54 1.05 8.28
0 A Davenport ( 9- 7, 91.6) 10-17 -8.31 13.63 0.54 1.05 -8.17
------
-40.61
|
